When analytical thinking goes wrong...
Just thought I'd try and draw some attention to one of the stupidest posts I've seen in quite some time, the thread speaks for itself. I'm commenting there, so join the party.
"But the study also found that "Native" Americans have dry ear wax and body odor similar to Asians, proving they migrated here from Asia... So whom did THEY steal the land from? Somebody else, obviously. Yet, no "Dances With Wolves" and "Into the West" from Hollywood about that.
Yeah. Seriously.
"But the study also found that "Native" Americans have dry ear wax and body odor similar to Asians, proving they migrated here from Asia... So whom did THEY steal the land from? Somebody else, obviously. Yet, no "Dances With Wolves" and "Into the West" from Hollywood about that.
Yeah. Seriously.
posted by Timmah420 at 6:43 PM
10 Comments:
The best part is - Debbie Schlussel is always posting her dreck on all these ultraright religious websites....none of which have any use for evolution.
But they'll all turn to evolutionary explanations when it suits their purposes.
Dingbats.
er with it that is.
Yeah I thought about that too, but it's all good in the wingnut universe.
They'd use string theory to prove that tax cuts for the rich are good if they thought they could get away from it.
gee.....that IS fucked up how your comments come up in an out of order fashion.....I wonder how that happened?
Staying off topic, tax cuts for the rich are good. How could they not be?
It goes back to my point about freedom of speech. I appreciate it here in the States, but I draw the line at teaching conservative cobagwads how to use a computer for ignorant rants.
Goddamn you Geek Squad and Dell for making this happen.
Kender, Are you actually taking issue with my comments or are you just trying to troll?
If you're trolling, fine.
If you're actually attempting to engage me in debate, make a point.
Ah, that loser wouldn't even let me post one measly comment on his site.
Wrong chuckles.....I haven't stopped you from commenting once.....and I was making the comment that tax breaks for the rich are a good thing.
You see, that's not a point, that's an unsupported statement.
Not only do you fail to note in what context are these hypothetical tax breaks "good", but you don't even support your first statement. Why are they good?
Also, I've been wanting to ask, is that you photoshopped into that picture?
If so, why is your face so puffy? I'm not trying to be insulting, but it looks like you dove face first into a poison ivy bush.
Post a Comment
<< Home